Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 2, 2024

Fantagraphics: At It Again!

Hello, 2024!

I'm sure many of you remember my expose of Fantagraphic's many crimes against its consumers, and the badness continues on.

For Christmas I received the first volume of Mickey Mouse: The Floyd Gottfredson Library. I'm really happy to finally read from another legend in animal funnies, as well as read more adventures starring my hero, Mickey Mouse. But at the same time Fantagraphics's awful handling of this lessens the enjoyment, just as they have screwed royally everything else they reprint.

Well, before I get to the complaints, I'll at least say that the actual work within the book is good. Gottfredson was a great teller-of-tales; probably not as much as Carl Barks, but way better than J.J. Abrams, that's for sure. Mickey quips too much, more like Spider-Man does, but at this point he was not the personality we all (or at least me) loves today. He also indulges like his species:

A note: the writer and artist of the few few weeks are listed in the book as Walt Disney and Ub Iwerks. I don't know how true this is. I never knew of either being involved in anything but their film work. This may be a publicity cover for the other artists that has somehow survived all these years. But something was different: the first few weeks were not only unfunny but really unfunny. If Disney was a great gagman, why were these so bad? He always seemed funny to me.

Anyway, while researching for this very blogpost, I saw that Fantagraphics has not finished this series yet, and it started in 2011. The latest Volume was 12, and that was in 2018. They stopped at late 1955, and they have exactly 20 years to go.

Also, as usual, there are apologies behind every corner. It would be understandable if they addressed any racism in the stories, but instead they crybaby over the silliest things, including gun usage and "soyboy" shaming. Anybody Left or Right or in the middle (myself) understands that these were written near-a-hundred years ago, so no need to let us know why we should be offended! (I don't know how much of this was editor David Gerstein's doing as much as Disney and Fantagraphics's identical policies.) 

And to top it off, essays and introductions abound with economical thesis navel-gazing.

Most all of this is unnecessary because, despite this being a collection of strips most-likely aimed at children, the majority of the buyers are adults. All that need be is a "This is intended for the adult collector..." disclaimer and be done with it! 

The irony is that the best words written in this volume is that of the living legend Floyd Norman, a man of color.

Floyd with Joe Grant.

But that's not all, folks. This volume has no Sundays, and is really thin. There is at least 202 pages of comic strips, with three years worth represented. I compared it to my most recent Pogo acquisition, Vol. 2. That has, including the Sundays, 314 pages of comics. That makes a literal 112 difference. And Pogo is only two years! This is even more scary when one considers that Gottfredson drew this thing for close to fifty years, while Kelly about thirty! There might be a reasonable explanation, if I look hard enough, but I smell something else...

But then again, there was a monster amount of special features, enough to fit two more years in, and a few were totally redundant, like a narrative of Mickey's creation, something 99.99999999% of readers know already. Also there are publicity posters and foreign covers, which is cool, but at the same time you wonder if these are available is different books on Mickey Mouse and then question, if they aren't, why not.

My guess is they are shortening the strip page numbers to make more volumes, and not only that...they are extending the number of volumes. And you know what that means. 

9 comments:

  1. Yes, I will comment on the Mickey Mouse end-of-copyright in the next post. Please don't ask me here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hans Christian BrandoJanuary 2, 2024 at 11:52 AM

    No, I won't ask about Mickey's current status, or actually anything. I just happened to notice the Chuck Jones quotes in the sidebar, specifically his remarks about "illustrated radio" and "I didn't write it as a script." I couldn't help thinking of his "Rabbit Seasoning" cartoons which are almost entirely dialogue driven.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the final volume, Fancy Graphics stated they were stopping the reprints at 1955, because the strip switched to the "gag-a-day" format, and the focus of the book series was the adventure serials. I myself would have liked for them to cover at least the next couple of years so we could get one more volume and also have a nice representation of Mickey's humor strip era.

    The Sunday MM strip wasn't launched until 1932, and those were showcased in two separate volumes covering the first six years.

    And, yeah, these tomes are a veritable disclaimer-o-rama, and judging by his editorial work in other Disney publications, Gerstein does tend to wield the PC hammer more often than not. As I mentioned in your previous piece, it might be best to skip the supplemental material altogether, and just concentrate on the strips, And they do improve mightily as the series progresses--Honest. Don't give up on them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems Gerstein's disclaimers don't matter that much to Disney since certain stories and/or pages (even dialog) are missing in recent Barks collections. And of course, Rosa's Life and Times has two of its stories banned going forward (the entire epic is basically banned according to Rosa on Facebook).

      Delete
    2. Mmm-HM. I did not know this, but am most definitely not surprised. Yet another reason to hold on to those Another Rainbow/Gladstone reprint editions.

      Delete
    3. top_cat_james: I'm not giving up on them...I have no choice! Also, what are Rainbow/Gladstone reprints?

      Jonathan Wilson: Yeah I heard about all that. The Rosa thing may change. Nothing like that ever stays. Archive, where are you?!

      Delete
    4. Oh, those were wonderful--You really missed out. I'll copy 'n' paste from Wiki to save time:

      Another Rainbow Publishing was a company dedicated to the re-publication and greater recognition of the work of Carl Barks that was created in 1981 by Bruce Hamilton and Russ Cochran. Its name references Barks's saying that there would be "always another rainbow" for his character Scrooge McDuck, which also became the title of one of Barks's oil paintings of the richest duck in the world. Its subsidiary division, Gladstone Publishing was founded in 1985 to handle non-Barks Disney comics. Several times throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Gladstone became the major publisher of Disney comics in the United States.

      In 1983 Another Rainbow began to publish the entire Disney comic book works of Barks—over 500 stories in all—in the ten-set, thirty-volume Carl Barks Library. These oversized hardbound volumes reproduced Barks' pages in pristine black and white line art, as close as possible to the way he had originally drawn them, and included many special features, articles, reminiscences, interviews, storyboards, and critiques. This project was completed in mid-1990. Another Rainbow subsidiary Gladstone publishing completed the re-publication of Barks's entire work, this time in color, from 1992 to 1998.

      In 1985 a new division was founded, "Gladstone Publishing", which took up the then-dormant Disney comic book license. Gladstone published Disney comic books by Barks, Paul Murry, and Floyd Gottfredson, and also presented the first works of modern Disney comics masters Don Rosa and William Van Horn. Gladstone's books were also among the first in the United States to regularly include Disney comics produced in Europe.

      Delete
    5. Cool sounding stuff! I'll check those out, definitely! Thanks!

      Delete

I try to answer every comment, even if it takes awhile.

Absolutely no hard language.